possible kernel issue

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

possible kernel issue

Antonio SJ Musumeci
http://imgur.com/bF7M7wO

Debian 8.6
Linux fil02 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux
FUSE kernel interface 7.19
libfuse version 2.9.3

I've another user with a kernel panic. The trace is different from the previous one I reported. The second image implies a hardware issue but I wanted to throw it to the list to see if there was something more.

Thanks.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
--
fuse-devel mailing list
To unsubscribe or subscribe, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: possible kernel issue

Miklos Szeredi
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Antonio SJ Musumeci
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> http://imgur.com/bF7M7wO
> http://imgur.com/PxnaOEX
>
> Debian 8.6
> Linux fil02 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03)
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> FUSE kernel interface 7.19
> libfuse version 2.9.3
>
> I've another user with a kernel panic. The trace is different from the
> previous one I reported. The second image implies a hardware issue but I
> wanted to throw it to the list to see if there was something more.

Not familiar.  Is this reproducible?  Could both be due to bad hardware?

Thanks,
Miklos

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
--
fuse-devel mailing list
To unsubscribe or subscribe, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: possible kernel issue

Antonio SJ Musumeci
Since I sent the original email the user informed me that it appears related to LUKS. Or maybe the load on the machine due to LUKS. They moved to ext4 for the underlying filesystems and the machine no longer crashed.

They are running more tests but it seems like FUSE is not the cause. Sorry for the noise.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Miklos Szeredi <[hidden email]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Antonio SJ Musumeci
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> http://imgur.com/bF7M7wO
> http://imgur.com/PxnaOEX
>
> Debian 8.6
> Linux fil02 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u1 (2016-09-03)
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> FUSE kernel interface 7.19
> libfuse version 2.9.3
>
> I've another user with a kernel panic. The trace is different from the
> previous one I reported. The second image implies a hardware issue but I
> wanted to throw it to the list to see if there was something more.

Not familiar.  Is this reproducible?  Could both be due to bad hardware?

Thanks,
Miklos


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
--
fuse-devel mailing list
To unsubscribe or subscribe, visit https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fuse-devel